ADVERTISEMENT
Get Started
  • About Homebase Tv | Hbtvghana.com
  • Advertise
  • Broadcast Live
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Vacancies
  • Contact Us – Connect With Us
Homebase Tv - Hbtvghana.com
  • Home
  • General News
  • Business News
  • Health
  • Life & Style
  • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Parliament
  • Sports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • General News
  • Business News
  • Health
  • Life & Style
  • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Parliament
  • Sports
No Result
View All Result
Homebase Tv - Hbtvghana.com
No Result
View All Result
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Madina, Adenta, Teiman, Ayi Mensa and over 70,000-acre lands don’t belong to Numo Nmashie family – Supreme Court

Thu, Dec 14 2023 10:29 AM
in Ghana General News
madina adenta teiman ayi mensa and over 70000 acre lands dont belong to numo nmashie family supreme court
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on TelegramShare on Whatsapp
ADVERTISEMENT
supreme court

The Supreme Court has clarified that the Numo Nmashie Family of Teshie in the Greater Accra Region cannot hold themselves as owners of 70 villages, which occupied over 72,000 acres of land. 

In its latest clarification, a five-member panel of the apex court presided over by the Chief Justice, Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Torkornoo, affirmed that the Numo Nmashie Family of Teshie could not claim ownership of the land because a Court of Appeal’s decision in 1982 which declared them owners of the piece of land was based on fraudulent information presented to the court.

The court, therefore, directed the Lands Commission to expunge all registration and certificates issued to the Numo Nmashie Family of Teshie, and the Tetteh Olewolon Family, regarding the 72,000 acres.

The court also directed that all third parties in possession and deriving title through the Numo Nmashie Family before the latest Supreme Court judgment were to attorn tenancy to the Boi Stool and relevant families. 

Affected villages in Boi Stool v. Daniel Addo Quaye & Ors

The villages affected by the decision are Peduase, Obuom, Nsakye, Agyemanti, Brotrease, Danfa, Adoteiman, Otinibi, Malidzano, Okyrekomfo Kotei, Taboadidi, Ayim, Adenkrebi, Abefia, Ayimensa, Kweiman, Odonkorkurom and Kwadwokurom.

Others are Otiakurum, Otopram, Brekusu, Kponko, Dedekurom, Sesemi, Teiman, Papao, Ogbodzo, Adaman, Mpehuasem, Otinshi, Otanor, La- Bawaleshie, Tesa, Adjiringano, Okpoi Gonno, Manmormo, Oshiyie, Amanfro, Bobamase, Abokobi, Nyamekurom, Oyarifa and Ogoha.

ReadAbout

CleanVibeGhana partners with Buzzstop Boys to ignite sanitation revolution through clean-up exercise

Asantehene assures Kumasi Zoo won’t be relocated

GJA condemns assault on journalists during Ablekuma North rerun

The rest are Ajangote, Akpomang, Boi, Pantang, Sempene, Frafraha, Apenkwa, Abladdzei, Ankome, Ashonman, Agbogba, Adenta, Otuwa, Madina, Nkwantanang, Ashale-Botwe, Atwuo-Okuman, Martey Tsuru, Gbatsuma, Okpegon, Ablekuma, Odediben, Agbleshia, Alegon, Mangoase, Teshie and Kpeshie Ridge.

The clarification affirmed the Supreme Court’s judgment dated March 22, 2023, which had Justice Jones Victor Mawulorm Dotse, as the presiding judge.

Other members of the panel were Justices Issifu Omoro Tanko Amadu, Nene Abayateye Ofoe Amegatcher, Avril Lovelace-Johnson and Emmanuel Yonny Kulendi.

The judgment was delivered in favour of the Boi Stool and 13 others.  

1982 Appeal

After the government procured the 25.031-acre land on the Adjancote Hill in 1966 through the Executive Instrument (E.I. 163), a State Lands Tribunal declared the Chief of Brekusu, Nana Adu Mireku Agyemang III, as being entitled to compensation against the Numo Nmashie Family and the Dowuona Family of Osu.

Dissatisfied with the decision of the Tribunal, the Numo Nmashie Family challenged the decision at the Court of Appeal in December 1982.

The decision of the tribunal was overturned by the Court of Appeal and declared the Numo Nmashie Family as the rightful family entitled to compensation.

The decision of the court was based on a survey done by a surveyor who told the court that the villages within the disputed area were occupied by members of the Numo Nmashie Family and that some villages had been established there.

The Numo Nmashie Family has since claimed to be owners of 70 villages, covering over 72,000 acres. 

1999 suit

Following the appeal, the Mantse of Boi, Nii Narh Dowuona II, sued the grantees (Olewolon Family which had the Numo Nmashie Family as co-defendants), claiming 87.68 acres which had been alienated from the grantees.

The Mantse of Boi’s suit was dismissed because the Numo Nmashie Family owned over 87 acres of land.

The decision was based on the 1982 appeal.

Appeal

An appeal against the Mantse of Boi’s suit which was dismissed, was thrown out at the Court of Appeal in November 2004 and a further appeal at the Supreme Court was dismissed in June 2006. 

Asserting ownership

Following the judgment in 2006, the Numo Nmashie Family started proclaiming to be owners of the 70 villages and caused the Executive Secretary of the Lands Commission to publish in the Daily Graphic to plot the judgment plan in respect of the 70 villages and families.

The families include La-Bawaleshie, Madina, Mpehuasem, Peduase and Abokobi, among others.

The Numo Nmashie Family again procured an order from the High Court to go into possession and demolition of properties on the land. 

High Court judgment

But that resulted in resistance, leading to another legal tussle at the High Court.

The Boi Stool, through its lawyer, Prosper Xorla Nyahe, argued that the Numo Nmashie Family fraudulently procured the 1982 judgment, urging the court to set the judgment aside.

In a judgment dated March 8, 2011, the High Court ruled in favour of the Boi Stool and 13 others and upheld that the Numo Nmashie Family fraudulently procured the judgment.

That was because witnesses from villages captured as being part of the 70 villages the Numo Nmashie Family had claimed ownership of, had told the court they were not under the Numo Nmashie Family, a testimony that weakened the Numo Nmashie Family. 

2011 Appeal

The Numo Nmashie Family then appealed the March 2011 judgment at the Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal reversed the March 2011 High Court judgment on the grounds that the Boi Stool and the 13 others had failed to establish evidence to support the claim of fraud and said it was bound by the decision of the 1982 judgment.

 That judgment was, subsequently, set aside by the Supreme Court in an appeal filed by the Boi Stool and the 13 others against the Olewolon Family which had the Numo Nmashie Family as co-defendants.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

  • President Commissions 36.5 Million Dollars Hospital In The Tain District
  • You Will Not Go Free For Killing An Hard Working MP – Akufo-Addo To MP’s Killer
  • I Will Lead You To Victory – Ato Forson Assures NDC Supporters

Visit Our Social Media for More

About Author

c16271dd987343c7ec4ccd40968758b74d64e6d6c084807e9eb8de11a77c1a1d?s=150&d=mm&r=g

hbtvghana

See author's posts

Discover interesting ones too

Businesses still battling power outages despite government assurances – PEF Boss

Businesses still battling power outages despite government assurances – PEF Boss

0
Few banks in Ghana facing larger capital gaps – IMF

Few banks in Ghana facing larger capital gaps – IMF

0

Ghana’s macroeconomic outlook remains broadly stable

Ghana’s public debt sustainable but still at high-risk of debt distress – IMF

CleanVibeGhana partners with Buzzstop Boys to ignite sanitation revolution through clean-up exercise

Energy Minister engages stakeholders ahead of ENI shutdown

Ghana hosts 4th International Maritime Defense Conference to tackle piracy and transnational crimes

IMF endorses ECG privatisation

Ablekuma North rerun: A win was expected because we worked hard – Ewurabena Aubynn

Finance Minister to deliver mid-year budget review on July 24

  • Ghana and Japan agree to pursue UN Security Council reforms

    Ghana and Japan agree to pursue UN Security Council reforms

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • I resigned because of Prez. Mahama, NDC – former GBA President

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Rastafarian student Oheneba Nkrabea graduates from GIS after Achimota saga

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • We slept in the same bed, but Ken Ofori-Atta’s legacy betrayed our hope – Frank Adu Jnr

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Western Region police arrest 44 suspects in major ‘galamsey’ raid

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Follow Homebase Tv

  • About Homebase Tv | Hbtvghana.com
  • Advertise
  • Broadcast Live
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Vacancies
  • Contact Us – Connect With Us

© 2014 Total Enjoyment & Proper News

No Result
View All Result

© 2014 Total Enjoyment & Proper News

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT

Add New Playlist

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.