Prince Harry has received a judgement in his case against British tabloid newspaper The Mirror. Mr Justice Fancourt, who presided over the trial earlier this year, said he found “extensive” phone hacking between 2006 and 2011, the PA reports.
Judge Fancourt, who handed down his lengthy judgment on Friday morning, local time, added that the British royal’s phone was likely hacked “to a modest extent” between 2003 and 2009.
He has been awarded “modest” damages, amounting to £140,600 ($180,000) to cover the “hurt” caused by the publisher’s “concealment” of their wrongdoing.
Harry, who now lives in California, sued the paper’s publisher Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), alleging that more than 30 stories it had printed about him dating back to the early 2000s had been written as a result of “unlawful information gathering,” colloquially known as hacking. The judge said Harry had proved his case in 15 of 33 of those instances.
But he added that Harry had a “tendency” to assume all articles about him come from unlawful information gathering but that was not the case. “Phone hacking was not the only journalistic tool at the time and his claim in relation to the other 18 articles did not stand up to careful analysis.”
“I recognise that Mirror Group was not responsible for all the unlawful activity that was directed at the Duke, and that a good deal of the oppressive behaviour of the Press towards the Duke over the years was not unlawful at all,” his judgment continued.
Judge Fancourt did not hand down an over-all ruling but instead gave detailed findings on each of the stories, determining whether or not he found the prince’s allegations credible.
Harry became the first senior royal in 130 years to testify when he entered the witness box at London’s High Court during the trial earlier this year. He was grilled over two days by MGN’s lawyer Andrew Green KC over dozens of articles which the prince claimed were the result of intercepting voicemails, impersonation or bribery.
In all instances bar one, for which the publisher accepted responsibility and apologised for at the beginning of the trial, MGN denied the claims.
In court, Green repeatedly pointed out that information on which the stories were based had come from Buckingham Palace press officers, other publications or, in one case, an interview the prince himself had given to the Press Association.
Broadcaster Piers Morgan edited The Mirror between 1995 and 2004, the period during which many of those stories were published. He did not testify during the trial — and said in a statement following the judgment that he was not asked by either side to testify — but in his judgment, Judge Fancourt said Morgan would “very likely have known” about at least one instance of unlawful information gathering.
Morgan appeared outside his home this afternoon to give a blistering statement to the press in which he said that, as he was not a part of the trial, “I wasn’t able to respond to the many false allegations that were spewed about me in court by old foes with an axe to grind.”
“I’ve never hacked a phone or told anyone else to hack a phone and nobody has produced any actual evidence to prove that I did,” Morgan said. “Prince Harry’s outrage about the media intrusion into the private lives of the Royal Family is only matched by his own ruthless, greedy and hypocritical enthusiasm for doing it himself. He talked today about the appalling behaviour of the press, but this is a guy who has repeatedly trashed his family in public for hundreds of millions of dollars… It’s hard to imagine frankly more appalling behaviour than that.”
The prince was not alone in his lawsuit against the tabloid publisher. He was joined by “Coronation Street” actors Michael Le Vell and Nikki Sanderson and by the ex-wife of comedian Paul Whitehouse, Fiona Wightman. Harry was represented in court by high-profile lawyer David Sherborne, whose other clients include Johnny Depp, Hugh Grant and Coleen Rooney.
In his controversial memoir “Spare,” Harry revealed he had met Sherborne while vacationing at Elton John’s home in the South of France, and the lawyer had encouraged him to fight back in court against what he believed were unlawful journalistic practices.
The prince is involved in a number of other lawsuits, including against the Daily Mail publisher Associated Newspapers and against the British government regarding security.
Harry was not in court on Friday, with his lawyer saying it was due to the “short notice” of the hearing. In a statement, which was read out in court by Harry’s lawyer, he said: “Today is a great day for truth as well as accountability.
The Court has ruled that unlawful and criminal activities were carried out at all three of Mirror Group’s newspaper titles (The Mirror, The Sunday Mirror and The People) on a habitual and widespread basis for more than a decade.”
“Today’s ruling is vindicating and affirming,” Harry continued. “I’ve been told that slaying dragons will get you burned. But in light of today’s victory and the importance of doing what is needed for a free and honest press – it’s a worthwhile price to pay. The mission continues.” Read his full statement below.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
- President Commissions 36.5 Million Dollars Hospital In The Tain District
- You Will Not Go Free For Killing An Hard Working MP – Akufo-Addo To MP’s Killer
- I Will Lead You To Victory – Ato Forson Assures NDC Supporters
Visit Our Social Media for More
About Author
