President John Dramani Mahama’s announcement that Ghana and China will finalise a comprehensive zero-tariff trade agreement by late October 2025 marks a pivotal moment in African trade. The deal, which removes tariffs on nearly all Ghanaian goods entering the massive Chinese market, is part of a wider Chinese policy covering 53 African nations. Hailed by President Mahama as an “act of solidarity,” this move ignites a rigorous debate: is it a genuine economic lifeline or a sophisticated diplomatic strategy designed to cement China’s geopolitical influence at a crucial time?
The Timely Context: The AGOA Void
The timing is strategically crucial. The offer directly follows the effective expiration of the United States’ African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), whose preferential terms lapsed on September 30, 2025. Due to the imposition of reciprocal tariffs by the US administration, Ghanaian exporters now face duties of up to 15% on goods entering the American market—a sudden, costly hurdle that has created immediate uncertainty for key sectors like textiles and apparel.
This sudden loss of duty-free access to a vital Western market makes China’s zero-tariff policy a powerful, urgent alternative. For struggling Ghanaian manufacturers, the deal is a necessary lifeline. Samson Asaki Awingobit, Executive Secretary of the Importers and Exporters Association of Ghana, confirmed the urgency, stating that exporters are already paying the 15% US tariffs, and government intervention is “too slow” to address the resulting commercial void.
Investment and Citizenship Incentives: Deepening the Stakes
The zero-tariff trade deal is interwoven with a new framework for attracting long-term capital. President Mahama, speaking in Beijing, announced plans for a new Investment Promotion Authority Bill. This bill will abolish minimum capital requirements for most foreign and joint venture investors and, most strikingly, provide a clear pathway to Ghanaian citizenship for long-term investors.
This inclusion escalates both the promise and the peril. While the incentive is designed to attract crucial Chinese capital for the $10 billion Big Push Infrastructure Programme, critics fear it risks diluting economic control and selling off national resources.
The high-value nature of the citizenship offer, coupled with streamlined investment rules, raises immediate red flags regarding governance and corruption, demanding robust parliamentary and civil society oversight. The message is clear: Ghana is seeking deep, long-term partnerships, not merely transactional trade.
Political and Business Skepticism
The zero-tariff deal, while welcomed by the government, has faced skepticism from within Ghana, particularly from the main opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP). Concerns center on the bundled nature of the agreement, which critics argue involves exchanging long-term sovereign assets and incentives—like the proposed clear pathway to Ghanaian citizenship for long-term investors—for short-term Chinese financing and infrastructure support.
The prevailing critique articulated by NPP-affiliated commentators is that the deal “smells of desperation,” demanding “full transparency on the debt terms before Ghana sells its future.” These voices urge the government to disclose all contractual details immediately to assure the public that the nation’s long-term interests are not being compromised.
Meanwhile, local manufacturers express caution about the immediate impact. Madam Akosua Osei-Bonsu, CEO of a large local garment producer, articulated a widely held business fear: “Zero tariffs to China is great, but what about the zero tariffs coming from China? We need strong local protections now, or the flood of cheaper Chinese goods will wipe out Ghanaian industries before we even begin exporting.”
The Exporter’s Opportunity vs. The Reality Check
For the Ghanaian farmer, agro-processor, and manufacturer, zero tariffs offer a significant opening to a market of 1.4 billion consumers. It immediately makes value-added products, from Kente cloth to finished chocolate bars, more price-competitive in China. As Foreign Affairs Minister Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa noted, this shift is key to job creation and “keeping the value and jobs in Ghana” rather than shipping raw commodities.
The Imbalance and Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs)
The core challenge remains the overwhelming trade deficit favoring China. China’s exports to Ghana jumped nearly 46% between 2020 and 2024, while Ghana’s exports to China rose only 11%. This suggests the tariff waiver alone won’t solve Ghana’s structural trade problems.
Ghana’s limited export growth is concentrated in raw or semi-processed commodities (mineral fuels, manganese, raw cocoa). Critics argue the fundamental issue is not high tariffs in China, but Ghana’s limited capacity to produce value-added goods at the required quality, scale, and consistency.
Additionally, removing tariffs does not eliminate Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs). These include complex Chinese sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) regulations and stringent technical standards. Michael Okyere Baafi, a Ranking Member of Parliament, cautioned that zero tariffs “doesn’t address why Ghana struggles to sell anything meaningful to China in the first place.”
Professor Peter Quartey, a prominent Ghanaian economist, provided the necessary crucial insight: “The removal of tariffs only addresses price. The real obstacle is Non-Tariff Barriers—the quality, labeling, and inspection standards required by China. If Ghanaian firms cannot meet these standards consistently, the zero tariff is merely a theoretical advantage that will go unused.” Ghanaian firms must still rigorously meet these high standards to utilize China’s new ‘Green Channels.’
Fiscal Risk and Trade Diversion
A critical fiscal consideration is the potential revenue loss. Ghana currently collects substantial customs revenue from Chinese imports. A future reciprocal zero-tariff agreement—where Ghana removes tariffs on Chinese goods—would mean a massive, immediate loss of national budget revenue.
Moreover, the loss of AGOA access risks trade diversion: Ghanaian firms may switch export destinations to China merely to avoid new US tariffs, rather than because they have a sustainable, competitive advantage there. This substitution is a fragile basis for long-term growth.
The Geopolitical and Debt Dimensions
The policy solidifies the 65-year Ghana-China diplomatic relationship. The focus on joint industrial projects, like the integrated aluminum industry utilizing Ghana’s bauxite reserves, confirms China’s goal of industrial integration and securing supply chain diversity. This cooperation is framed by Chinese officials as being WTO-compliant, providing international legal legitimacy.
Debt Trap Risk and Political Uncertainty
The $10 billion Big Push Infrastructure Programme is funded by Chinese capital and must be viewed against Ghana’s severe public debt crisis. Critics warn that new Chinese loans risk deepening the debt trap, particularly given the potential for debt-for-resource swaps.
The integrated aluminum industry project explicitly links Ghanaian resources to Chinese capital, demanding transparent contract governance to ensure sovereign wealth creation, not merely resource control transfer.
A major Political Risk lies in the upcoming 2028 election cycle. A change in administration could lead to scrutiny, renegotiation, or cancellation of multi-billion-dollar Chinese-backed projects, creating investment uncertainty.
Regional Competition and AfCFTA
Since China’s policy covers 53 African nations, it is a universal opportunity that heightens regional competition. While some argue Ghana should prioritize the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), the China deal can be seen as necessary external pressure. Successfully meeting China’s stringent NTBs positions Ghanaian firms to thrive across the entire African continent under AfCFTA, ultimately benefiting intra-African trade.
Invitation, Not Guarantee
China’s zero-tariff policy is a strategic counter-move against rising global protectionism, positioning Beijing as a reliable partner for the Global South. As Ambassador Tong Deta stressed, the policy is a “mutually beneficial” arrangement.
Crucially, the zero-tariff deal is a generous invitation—an open door to a new global market. The success of this opportunity, however, is not guaranteed by diplomacy. It is entirely dependent on Ghana moving swiftly to implement a robust national industrial and logistics strategy.
The real work is turning preferential access into sustained industrial capability; otherwise, Ghana risks simply becoming a larger destination market for Chinese imports, rather than a strong exporter to China.
- President Commissions 36.5 Million Dollars Hospital In The Tain District
- You Will Not Go Free For Killing An Hard Working MP – Akufo-Addo To MP’s Killer
- I Will Lead You To Victory – Ato Forson Assures NDC Supporters
Visit Our Social Media for More
About Author
